Did the trial court correctly apply West Virginia law regarding comparative negligence, contribution, and settlement in a case sounding in both contract and tort?
Displaying 281 - 290 of 407 results.
In a 2013 decision, the Supreme Court expanded coverage under a comprehensive general liability policy to include faulty workmanship. Does this 2013 decision apply retroactively?
In this case involving an executive session held by a county planning commission, the Supreme Court held that public agencies must fully comply with both the notice and publication requirements of the Open Governmental Proceedings Act.
This case presents an unusual mix of legal topics: the statute of frauds, court-ordered mediation, and mineral rights. How will the Supreme Court strike a proper balance?
The issue raised in this case involving alleged "pill mill" operations is: May a plaintiff sue for damages where his claim is based, in whole, or in part, on illegal or immoral conduct?
Do attorney ethics rules express statements of public policy and, if so, can they be used to invalidate a contract?
In a win for student athletes, the Supreme Court holds that the SSAC's rule denying any review of an ejection from a game as a result of unsportsmanlike conduct violated the SSAC's enabling statute, W.Va. Code § 18-2-25.
In a prescriptive easement case involving two brothers, the Supreme Court reaffirms longstanding principles regarding jury trials, waiver, and adverse use.
In this medical malpractice case, the Supreme Court considers a host of trial issues, including an issue involving the striking of an African-American juror.
Supreme Court hands a victory to employees in a wage payment case decided earlier this month.