How will the Supreme Court interpret a 2017 law dealing with noise levels at shooting ranges?

W.Va. Code 29-12A-5(a)(4) grants immunity where the claim results from the government's adoption or failure to adopt a policy. Will this immunity apply in a simple car wreck case where the policy required two people to be present in the car, but had nothing to do with the car's operation?

Supreme Court tackles issues of contract formation and waiver in yet another arbitration case.

In a wrongful death case, the Supreme Court considers (1) whether an ex spouse who was co-parenting a child with the deceased may be equitably entitled to share of the proceeds of a settlement, and (2) whether a personal representative in a wrongful death case is entitled to compensation.

Family business case presents multiple issues, including an intriguing attorney fee issue.

Should an arbitration agreement in an employment setting receive different treatment from one in a commercial setting?

Supreme Court tackles coverage and bad faith issues in a property damage case.

Arbitration and res judicata issues raised in an oil and gas leasing case.

Does Michigan law doom a birth defect case involving Zoloft where the mother was living in Michigan and the baby was born in Michigan?

Are references to "courts" and "civil actions" contained in the text of an oil and gas lease, but not in the arbitration clause itself, enough to render the clause ambiguous and unenforceable?