‹ Supreme Court Blog
Bluestem Brands, Inc. v. Darlene Shade

Bluestem Brands, Inc. v. Darlene Shade

Case No. 
16-0793
County 
Berkeley
Court Term 
Fall 2017
Decision 
Reversed
Issue: 

Petitioner appeals the circuit court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. Petitioner contends the circuit court erred in finding that respondent did not manifest her assent to the arbitration agreement and that petitioner, as a non-party to the arbitration agreement, was not entitled to compel respondent to arbitration.

Petitioner's Attorneys: 

M. David Griffith, Jr.

Joseph K. Merical

Respondent's Attorneys: 

Jonathan R. Marshall

Patricia M. Kipnis

Andrew C. Skinner

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Contact Us

888-4-JUSTICE

Contact us today to speak with a knowledgeable attorney. We offer free initial consultations and bill on a contingent fee basis — you won’t have to pay us a fee unless we collect money for you.